Global warming study raises the steaks

Beef’s environmental impact dwarfs that of other meat, including chicken and pork, new research reveals, with one expert saying that eating less red meat would be a better way for ­people to cut carbon emissions than giving up their cars.

The heavy impact on the environment of meat production was known but the research shows a new scale and scope of damage, particularly for beef. The popular red meat requires 28 times more land to produce than pork or chicken, 11 times more water and results in five times more climate-warming emissions. When compared with staples such as potatoes, wheat and rice, the impact of beef per calorie is even more extreme, requiring 160 times more land and producing 11 times more greenhouse gases.

Read More

Donate Volunteer Join

Connect with Us

Links

Latest California News

Officials in Oakland, California, effectively ended proposals to open a new coal export terminal by voting to ban the transport and storage of the fossil...

Oil corporations have intensified their push to make the San Francisco Bay Area and other areas of the West Coast into international hubs for refining...

In a major victory for solar power companies and their customers, California regulators voted to preserve an incentive program that has fueled the dramatic growth...

It was widely reported last week that the public relations and lobbying blitz funded by the major oil companies succeeded in toppling one of Jerry...

As Western wildfires follow the worst drought in modern history, the impacts of global warming have never been more stark. And as electric cars, LED...